International students’ conceptions about learning and teaching: An exploration through metaphor analysis
Mengyao Ma 1 * , Morane Stevens 2 * , Jan Elen 3 *
More Detail
1 KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Belgium
2 KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Instructional Psychology and Technology, Belgium
3 KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Itec, imec research group at KU Leuven, Belgium
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Students’ conceptions of learning and teaching influence students’ learning experiences and outcomes, and these conceptions are deeply shaped by students’ cultural backgrounds. Understanding students’ conceptions of learning and teaching has become critically important with higher education’s growing internationalization. This urgency, however, is overlooked as internationalization discourse remains confined to policy realms, neglecting pedagogical implications. To address this issue, this study explores international students’ conceptions of learning and teaching through metaphor analysis and interprets them using Hofstede’s cultural dimension framework. A total of 204 metaphor responses of international students are collected in this study. Then this study identifies, categorizes, and compares variations in students’ conceptions of learning and teaching using phenomenographically informed qualitative analyses. The results reveal both notable diversity and meaningful similarities in international students’ conceptions of learning and teaching. Findings reveal convergence toward student-centered learning across cultures, alongside the continued dominance of teacher-centered teaching conceptions. Discussed through Hofstede’s cultural dimension framework, these results show clear cross-cultural differences while also highlighting several conceptions shared across cultural clusters. These findings underscore the importance of acknowledging and engaging with diverse learning and teaching conceptions to create culturally responsive instruction in higher education. They also invite a critical reflection on Hofstede’s cultural dimension framework, highlighting both its usefulness for structuring cross-cultural comparisons and its constraints in representing the nuanced, dynamic identities of contemporary international students.

Keywords

References

  • Åkerlind, G.S. (2005). Learning about phenomenography: Interviewing, data analysis and the qualitative research paradigm. In Bowden, J. & Green, P. (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 63-73). RMIT Publishing.
  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). A phenomenographic approach to developing academics’ understanding of the nature of teaching and learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802452350
  • Alamdarloo, G.H., Moradi, S., & Dehshiri, G. (2013). The relationship between students’ conceptions of learning and their academic achievement. Psychology, 4(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.41006
  • Bas, G., & Kıvılcım, Z. S. (2020). High school students’ conceptions about learning and instruction: A metaphor analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 272-290. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020064182
  • Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
  • Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Oxford University Press.
  • Bottiani, J. H., Larson, K., Debnam, K., Bischoff, C., & Bradshaw, C.P. (2017). Promoting
  • educators’ use of culturally responsive practices: A systematic review of in-service interventions. Journal of Teacher Education, 69 (4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117722553
  • Boulton-Lewis, G.M., Marton, F., Lewis, D.C., & Wils, L.A. (2004). A longitudinal study of learning for a group of indigenous Australian university students: Dissonant conceptions and strategies. Higher Education 47(1), 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000009807.00392.33
  • Bradbeer, J., Healey, M., & Kneale, P. (2004). Undergraduate geographers’ understandings of geography, learning and teaching: a phenomenographic study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826042000198611
  • Briell, J., Elen, J., Depaepe, F., & Clarebout, G. (2010). The exploration of drawings as a tool to gain entry to students’ epistemological beliefs. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(2), 655–688.
  • Carroll, J., & Ryan, J. (Eds.). (2005). Teaching international students: Improving learning for all. Routledge.
  • Chan, K. (2004). Preservice teachers' epistemological beliefs and conceptions about teaching and learning: Cultural implications for research in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2004v29n1.1
  • Chan, W. Y., & Dimmock, C. (2008). The internationalization of universities. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 184-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240908091304
  • Chinese Cultural Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002187018002002
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
  • Dahlgren, L., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Hult, H., Hård af Segerstad, H., Szkudlarek, T. (2006). Conceptions of learning among teachers and students in higher education. A Swedish-Polish comparative study. Anthology of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 89-115.
  • Eklund-Myrskog, G. (1998). Students’ conceptions of learning in different educational contexts. Higher Education, 35(3), 299–316. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3448217
  • Entwistle, N. J. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160202
  • Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009
  • Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718637
  • Entwistle, N., Skinner, D., Entwistle, D., & Orr, S. (2000). Conceptions and beliefs about “good teaching”: An integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360050020444
  • Gu, Q., & Schweisfurth, M. (2006). Who adapts? Beyond cultural models of ‘the’ Chinese learner. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668755
  • Hattingh, S. (2015). A review of literature: what is an ideal internationalised school? Educational Review, 68(3), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1087970
  • Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  • Hofstede Insights. (2015). Country comparison cultural dimensions [Data set]. https://geerthofstede.com/research-and-vsm/dimension-data-matrix/
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Jippes, M., & Majoor, G. D. (2008). Influence of national culture on the adoption of integrated and problem-based curricula in Europe. Medical education, 42(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02993.x
  • Joy, S., & Kolb, D. A. (2008). Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.11.002
  • Kember, D., Jenkins, W., & Ng, K. (2003). Adult students’ perceptions of good teaching as a function of their conceptions of learning—Part 1: Influencing the development of self-determination. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(2), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037032000131556
  • Kember, D., & Wong, A. (2000). Implications for evaluation from a study of students’ perceptions of good and poor teaching. Higher Education, 40(1), 69–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3447952
  • Kennedy, C. (2010). Conceptions of learning and teaching: Impact on the perceptions of quality. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(17), 111-122.
  • Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832
  • Kole, J. K. T. (2025). Applying Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in education: insights, critiques, and implications for diverse classrooms. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.135007
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago.
  • Lim, L., Tan, M., & Saito, E. (2018). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Developing principles of description and analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.011
  • Love, K., & Arkoudis, S. (2004). Sinking or swimming? Chinese international students and high stakes school exams. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.27.1.05lov
  • MacKinnon, D., & Manathunga, C. (2003). Going global with assessment: What to do when the dominant culture’s literacy drives assessment. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360304110
  • Mahlios, M., Massengill‐Shaw, D., & Barry, A. (2010). Making sense of teaching through metaphors: a review across three studies. Teachers and Teaching, 16(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903475645
  • Mannay, D. (2015). Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Application, reflection and ethics (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775760
  • Martı́nez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 965-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9
  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography—A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42589189
  • Marton, F. (1994). Phenomenography. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 4424–4429). Pergamon Press.
  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053690
  • Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 227-300.
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Stuart, J., Smith, A., & Campbell, Z. (2011). Drawings as research method. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, & J. Stuart (Eds.), Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology (pp. 19–36). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-596-3_2
  • Mittelmeier, J., Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., & Nguyen, Q. (2016). Learning analytics to understand cultural impacts on technology enhanced learning. In D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2016) (pp. 236-243). IADIS Press.
  • Otting, H., Zwaal, W., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2010). The structural relationship between students’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions of teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903383203
  • Parpala, A., Lindblom‐Ylänne, S., & Rytkönen, H. (2011). Students’ conceptions of good teaching in three different disciplines. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541023
  • Purdie, N.M., & Hattie, J.A. (2002). Assessing students' conceptions of learning. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 2, 17-32.
  • Qi, H. (2022) Conceptions about teaching and learning held by EFL teachers and learners in China. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 314-325. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.102023
  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867396
  • Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278955
  • Ryan, J. (2011). Teaching and learning for international students: Towards a transcultural approach. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(6), 631 - 648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.625138
  • Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers' metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.017
  • Şahin, A & Sabanci, A. (2018). The Perception of pedagogical formation students have towards educational concepts: Metaphoric study. Journal of Education and Future, 13, 179-207.
  • Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Sandberg, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable? Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160207
  • Schouteden, W., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2016). Teachers’ general and contextualised research conceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914915
  • Stevens, M., & Elen, J. (2024). ‘Picturing’ instruction: an exploration of higher education students’ knowledge of instruction. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), 206-220.
  • Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: what does it really mean? Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218
  • Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. (2016). Does country equate with culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 56(4), 455–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0283-x
  • Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B. C., Giesbers, S. J. H., & Schim van der Loeff, S. (2013). How cultural and learning style differences impact students’ learning preferences in blended learning. In E. Jean François (Ed.), Transcultural blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education (pp.30-51). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2014-8.ch003
  • Triandis, H. C. (1984). Toward a psychological theory of economic growth. International Journal of Psychology, 19(1-2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598408247517
  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160210
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194
  • Tsai, C.C. (2017). Conceptions of learning in technology-enhanced learning environments: A review of case studies in Taiwan. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal 12(2), 184-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-12-2017-0038
  • Tsai, P. S., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Students’ conceptions of and approaches to knowledge building and its relationship to learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 749-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1178653
  • Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2010). University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science, 38(4), 355–370. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23372854
  • Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Van Driel, J. H., Van der Rijst, R. M., Verloop, N., & Visser, A. (2009). The relationship between academics' conceptions of knowledge, research and teaching – A metaphor study. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(6), 673–686. https://doi-org.kuleuven.e-bronnen.be/10.1080/13562510903315340
  • Vermunt, J.D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. High Education 31(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129106
  • Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9(3), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00028-0
  • Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23363877
  • Wegner, E., & Nückles, M. (2016). Training the brain or tending a garden? Students’ metaphors of learning predict self-reported learning patterns. Frontline Learning Research, 3(4),95–109. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i4.212
  • Yamazaki, Y. (2005). Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(5), 521-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.006
  • Zhang, H., & Chan, P. W. K. (2023). Understanding and supporting international students learning: Perspective of teachers. International Education Journal : Comparative Perspectives, 22(1), 74-90. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/IEJ/article/view/16614

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.